Nightcrawler (2014)
Producers: Betsy Danbury, Gary
Michael Walters, et al.
Director: Dan
Gilroy
Rated: R
for violence including graphic images, and for language
Runtime: 117
min
Genre: Crime, Drama,
Thriller
The
trailer for Nightcrawler
sold viewers on a movie that seemed to be an indictment of
sensationalist media, and a character study of a man who goes from
light-hearted go gettter to lunatic willing to do whatever it takes
to get his next bit of grisly footage. Remember the scene from the
trailer in which Jake Gyllenhaal is screaming at his mirror,
furiously attempting to rip it from the wall? Surely that's the
turning point of the movie, right? That's the moment when this
movie's version of Travis Bickle goes from socially awkward, with an
unhealthy obsession with a woman out of his reach, to reprobate film
journalist willing to make news when none exists. Sadly it's not,
the movie never takes that next step to something big.
Gyllenhaal,
for his part, does a good job conveying the mindset of his character.
He embodies the ambitious Louis Bloom, full of self-help cliches and
a willingness to ignore societal niceties to advance himself. He's
almost always polite, while wearing people down with his persistence.
There are a couple of moments when some anger leaked through his
carefully crafted facade, and each time I got excited to see the next
level of crazy he might exhibit. He never reaches that next level
though, even when Bloom sets his coworker up for tragedy he does so
in such a wormy way that it doesn't elicit much of a reaction from
the audience. Maybe the darker side of someone so eternally
optimistic is supposed to make an impact, but the latter part of the
movie lacked to punch that a real change in the character could have
provided.
In
August movie goers were treated to a film that examined the nature of
news coverage; the news' ability to shape a story and drive the
narrative despite not having all the facts, in Gone
Girl.
I expected something similar here; an examination of how far the
media will go to deliver the news they deem worthy of delivering.
Maybe with a bit of commentary on why the public tunes in to violence
and misery as long as it's not their own. There's one side character
who's purpose it seems was to do something along those lines, but
that side of the argument is drowned out by talk of money and
ratings. It is another missed opportunity in a movie that should
have done something to give itself a purpose, but didn't.
All
of this is not to say Nightcrawler
is a bad movie. Dan Gilroy clearly has a love for the city of Los
Angles, and it makes a very interesting backdrop for the story. The
sprawling cityscapes offer a very different setting than the
claustrophobic streets of the more commonly used New York City. I
enjoyed the entire cast, even Bill Paxton. Sure his usage of “brah”
seemed a little forced, but this is the second supporting role I've
seen him in this year that made me think positive things about him.
I'm not sure if he's gotten to the point where his career needs a
resurgence, but if it does I hope he's now trending in the right
direction.
Conclusion:
Some missed opportunities keep this from being the movie I thought
it could be. While all the technical and performance aspects are
handled superbly I left the theater feeling like the script didn't
take the chances that it could have. Instead of exposing the media
and our own viewing preferences for violent 'news' as a strange
appetite for others' suffering, and showing us what damage the hunt
for another grisly crime scene could do to a fragile psyche, the
audience is treated to something that is just less than it could have
been.
Rating:
7/10
No comments:
Post a Comment